User:Lilgingy/Bluespine unicornfish/Jaydonj Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to Sandbox draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the Article in Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the Article in Wikipedia

Peer Review
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) Any turn of phrase that described the species in a clear way?
 * 4) Check the sources:
 * 5) Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 6) Does the article only discuss the species the article is about?
 * 7) Is there a reference list at the bottom? Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 8) What is the quality of the sources?
 * 9) What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
 * 10) Why would those changes be an improvement?
 * 11) Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 12) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 13) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?