User:Lilladlili/Temperate deciduous forest/Thea.sar Peer Review

General info
Lilladlili
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Lilladlili/Temperate deciduous forest
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Temperate deciduous forest

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead


 * I think you have added a lot of good content about temperate deciduous forests that was lacking in the original article. However, the lead does not reflect some of these changes, like the characteristics section with information on soil, flora, and fauna. Maybe adding one sentence to the lead to reflect this change will help give a better idea of what will follow in the rest of the article. However I do think that the Geography and Climate sections are set up will by the lead as there are mentions as to where these forests can be found and the cycle of seasons is mentioned as well.
 * Yes, the introductory sentence gives a good general overview of what a temperate deciduous forest is
 * I think the lead has just the right amount of detail without including too much information

Content


 * I think the added content is definitely relevant to the topic and belongs within the article, it provides a lot of good information the original article didn't have
 * Your content appears up to date, based off the dates from your references.

Tone and Balance


 * I think your writing read very neutral, it did not feel like I was trying to be persuaded in any specific way, and felt informational.

Sources and References


 * I think you did a good job of citing your drafted changes, I can tell from which source the information is coming from and am not left to guess.
 * A lot of your sources are either scientific papers, or come from other reliable sources like universities, because of this I would say that your sources are definitely thorough, and the information you are pulling from them is well-researched and trustworthy. You also have sources from many different authors, and your links are working!

Organization


 * I think your drafted changes are very well organized, there is a logical flow to the information and the sub-sections make sense and go along with the main section they are a part of

Overall Impressions


 * I think the additions you have drafted are very thorough and definitely add to the content of the original article and improve it, I think the information is very clearly written and is understandable to someone reading it. I think potential things you could add to your article include threats to temperate deciduous forests, and what those might be.