User:Lilmisnicole/Retraction in academic publishing/NeptunePlayss Peer Review

General info
(Lilmisnicole)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Lilmisnicole/Retraction in academic publishing - Wikipedia
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Retraction in academic publishing - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The draft of this article is adding a section related to alternative methods of retraction. This adds more insight into the method of retracting a scientific article and provides examples of how this is done. "Self-retraction by an author is recommended before it is published because once it gets retracted from the journal, then that it will affect the author(s) because investigations will begin which will have an effect the author's reputation." Needs a source or evidence to back up the claim. Remove the words "then that". Add the word "on" in between "effect" and "the".