User:Lilylolo

/sandbox

"Outline of the Case'

(1)Background

(2)District Court Opinion (Melaleuca I)
 * Discussion of CAN-SPAM Act
 * Standing for CAN-SPAM Act
 * Bona Fide ISP requirement
 * Adversely affected requirement

(3)District Court Opinion (Melaleuca II)
 * Affirmed previous holding

(4)Significance
 * Compare to similar case, Gordon v. Virtuomondo

(5)Further Reading

Bibliography:


 * Melaleuca II District Court Proceeding 2011,


 * Melaleuca I District Court Proceeding 2010,


 * Magistrate Judge Decision,


 * Blog Discussing Gordon v. Virtumundo,


 * Blog (Eric Goldman),


 * http://www.scribd.com/doc/41490886/Melaleuca-Inc-v-Hansen-CV-07-212-E-EJL-MHW-D-Idaho-Sept-30-2010


 * http://blogs.findlaw.com/ninth_circuit/2009/08/gordon-v-virtumundo-inc-no-07-35487.html


 * www.klgates.com/files/Publication/.../Ecommerce_law_reports.pdf