User:Lilysloan1/Physician burnout/Exoticgiraffe Peer Review

Thank you! I put my response to the peer review on the discussion board.

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? Lilysloan1
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Lilysloan1/Physician burnout

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The lead has not been updated to reflect the new content, but since this is a first draft, I think that this should be fine for now. Just make sure when you add your content to add something mentioning all you added to to the article in the lead. I think that it mostly speaks to the topics you are adding already, so I do not think that this should take a huge amount of work or information.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
I think that the content you are adding is extremely pertinent to this topic. There is a very minuscule section on impacted populations, so I am glad that you chose to add content to these sections. It seems that the articles cited are older, so I would try to get content from sources that are more recent. I am sure there are several sources that are talking about this important issue.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Tone and balance evaluation
I think that the way the content is presented is unbiased and neutral. This topic seems naturally neutral, so I think you should have an easy time staying in that tone. It does not seem to be biased towards an opinion or position because it is not a particularly controversial topic.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
I think that all the articles you used as sources are reliable, but most are older. I would suggest finding more current information to add to the article because I am sure there is more content added about this subject online. I think that the sources used are good, but try to bulk them up some more.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Organization evaluation
The content added is very easy to read and written in a good way. It does not seem to have any glaring errors, but I would check over it before publishing anything to be safe. I think that the addition to subheadings in this section will aid in getting the information you want across throughout the article.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Images and media evaluation
There were no images or media added to this article.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
I think that the content added is going to benefit the article immensely. The sections you are adding to are very bare but are important to the article and the topic. You write very well and get your point across in a concise way. I think if you add more current sources, then you will be on your way to some great additions to this article!