User:Limbsaw/Vandals etc

Vandalism
I simply do not see the point in it. It takes time to find the page you want vandalise, and then click the edit tab, and then actually type. I mean, what are you genuinely going to get out of it? At the end of the day, the disruptive editing that someone performs is only going to get rollbacked... And it is a lot more easier for us patrollers to click the undo button than actually perform the vandalism in the first place!

Useful links

 * 1) Template messages/User talk namespace
 * 2) Disruptive editing
 * 3) Template:Vandal

Good faith, possible disruptive edit - constructive criticism template
Thank you for your contributions to **Article in question**. However, I reverted your recent [**Edit link in question** edit] on said article because we can't accept:
 * speculation;
 * personal commentary;
 * original research (OR) in articles.

—General comment on what they did wrong, and how they could improve their edit—

You are welcome to share your thoughts about this on **Article in question's** talk page, or even my own talk page here.

FYI; I do understand that your edit was indeed a good faith edit, please do not interpret this as a harsh comment/personal attack towards you, I am simply explaining why I reverted you edit.

Thank you

Template for leaving edit summarises empty
Dear ___

Many thanks for your recent contributions to Wikipedia, and especially ___. However you left you edit summary box blank, meaning other editors/users "may question your motives for the edit", "because it may not be obvious what the purpose of the edit was". "It is considered good practice to provide a summary for every edit, especially when reverting (undoing) the actions of other editors or deleting existing text" - after investigation, your intended edit was indeed to delete existing text, but for the better of the article. This is admirable and bold. I am not saying your edit was incorrect, I am simply saying it was a good/positive edit, but you must remember to summarise your edits on wikipedia. Otherwise it is unclear of your edit for other users, which may even lead to your edit being wrongly reverted... then even possibly resulting in an edit war - but not with me, I don't believe in them. (Complying with; WP:FIES, WP:BB, WP:EW)

- If you have any questions/comments relating to the ___, please start a discussion on the ___.

- If you have any questions/comments relating to this post, please simply reply below, remembering to indent you line with ':' at the start of the line and pinging me so I receive the message with the code:

Anyway, nice speaking to you; see you around!

Thanks,