User:Lindsaymr/Grebo people/Quinnmac99 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lindsaymr


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lindsaymr/Grebo_people?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Grebo people
 * Grebo people



Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead Guiding questions: Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer? Content Guiding questions: Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Peer review Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:
 * No Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * No but it is missing some information Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Maybe too concise, could add more information/ an overview of what the article will cover.
 * Yes it is relevant, it reveals more information on ritual artifacts and goes into death on various spirits that are recognized and celebrated.  Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Yes the content is up to date and uses information from an article published in 2014 and seems to be a reliable source. Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * There is definitely still some content missing but they've done a good job at filling in more specifics on rituals and making that section cover a lot more information.  Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes the article discusses the Grebo people who are an underrepresented ethnic group in Africa.

Sources and References Guiding questions:  Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information? Organization Guiding questions:  Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read? Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic? For New Articles Only If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above. Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject? How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject? Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles? Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable? Overall impressions Guiding questions:  Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * Tone and Balance Guiding questions:  Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes the content added is neutral and discusses information discovered about specific spirits and objects that are said to be important to the Grebo people. Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Yes, as of right now most of the information is focused on this groups rituals and spiritual practices whereas some of the other sections are still underdeveloped. Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No.
 * Yes the new content is linked to a reliable reference. Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Yes it does a good job at creating a synopsis without directly repeating information. Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * There is only one new source used but I assume more will be added in the future. The other sources in there before editing seem reliable. Are the sources current?
 * Yes, from the last 10 years Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Only one new source but the sources that are used represent a good variety.  Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * There are more sources out there and I am assuming they will use them in the future when more work is done on the article.  Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes
 * Yes, it does a good job summarizing without repeating Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No, not that I caught Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes, the new information is located in the right category. Images and Media  Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
 * No Are images well-captioned?
 * N/A Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * N/A Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * N/A
 * Yes, there is more information on the ritual section and I feel like I have a better grasp on their practices than I did from reading the original article. What are the strengths of the content added?
 * The information is well organized and does a good job at summarizing without droning on too long or leaving important pieces out. It gives good details still and lets us know specific information on practices carried out by the Grebo. How can the content added be improved?
 * More content would be the best way to improve this.