User:Lindseyfturner106/sandbox

Peer review responses:

User: Kbischoff99- I appreciate you taking the time to peer review my edits. I am extremely glad my edits are neutralized as that can sometimes be difficult. I believe though with my topic, it is easier to remain neutral considering I am just providing information on childhood schizophrenia.

User: Gsimm99- To begin, thank you for reviewing my edits. I plan on extending the information on "highest risk among relatives" section as I believe there more than likely is more information out there on it. I also will most likely try to extend the information on all 4 sections I have added. I feel as if I didn't realize how much information is between all of those topics. Regarding the abbreviated "COS," I actually thought I mentioned that was the abbreviation for childhood onset schizophrenia. I am glad you caught this mistake and informed me. I will absolutely be changing that in the beginning paragraph. I will also try to look for images to refer back to when individuals read the finished article because I also am a visual person so I enjoy referring back to charts and pictures as well.

User: DET313205- Thank you for the feedback. I actually did add all of that information. I am extremely interested in mental disorders in adolescents so this topic was one I actually particularly enjoyed and was easy for me to continue to add information. I will definitely take your suggestion about adding more precise titles. I actually agree as to how that would be useful for readers.

User: JessDeckk- Jess, these are some great suggestions. I actually didn't even think of looking and exploring treatments to show the accuracy or non accuracy of certain medications. It would be interesting to determine which ones seem to be the most effective for children versus adults. I personally enjoy seeing the difference of different cohorts and how medications effect them individually. If I decided to add another separate article, I will explore this topic. Thank you for the feedback!