User:Lingleigh/Origin of language/WordlyWaleed Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(Lingleigh)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lingleigh/Origin_of_language?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Origin of language

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead is great because it opens with the topic that tools have been found and their function is directly related to the topic which is a vast topic. While their should be a separate section for the lead, the first few sentences can be used if the point is more direct.

The content is very good and informative and very informative as it provides a unique angle to which the origin of language can be explained. It provides information where gaps could have been with clear data and research that has been applied.

Tone and balance is very much like a proper wiki article and can be seen as an unbiased point of view. It reviews straight facts and uses data to back the claims which are paraphrased from others work.

Sources are reliable and have interesting topics, they are derived from scholarly studies in which the information is given to the public but not properly explained or related to the topic.