User:Linyaf/User:Linyaf/Orange chicken/Shy63 Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) : Linyaf
 * Link to draft you're reviewing: User:Linyaf/Orange chicken

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

I think you might be able to add some information about this topic into the lead. I felt that the lead was really short.


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?

It is really simple and straight to the point, but it could be improved.


 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?

It doesn't contain that much of brief information about the topic.


 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

It is not overly detailed.

Lead evaluation
I think you might want to add more detail about the topic into the lead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes, I like a section that Linyaf added about popularity in the US. Maybe if this author add more history behind it would be more strong context to this article.


 * Is the content added up-to-date?

Yes


 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

I don't think there is a content that doesn't belong, but I am not sure if this article needs panda express nutritious facts.

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?

Yes, his content is really neutral.


 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

No


 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

No, I don't think so

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes, secondary resources are supporting his claims.


 * Are the sources current?

Yes


 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?

Yes, there are many references from variety of authors.


 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Yes, it worked.

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?

Yes, it is clear, simple and neutral tone.


 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?

Nothing that I know of


 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Yes, I like the way this author sectioned each categories of sub topics.

Images and Media
Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

Yes, they have two images that represent the topic.


 * Are images well-captioned?

Yes


 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?

Yes


 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Yes

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?

Yes, I think a content that this author added is great topic to add into this topic. I think if this author improve the lead section, it would be more informational and easier for the readers to read.


 * What are the strengths of the content added?

I really liked the content about popularity in the US. It is relevant, but also it is interesting facts.


 * How can the content added be improved?

Maybe you could talk about orange chicken but not from Panda Express to make it more broad.