User:Lipidmonolayer1/Pentakis(trimethylphosphine)tungsten/Mikenuggets22 Peer Review

General info
Lipidmonolayer1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Pentakis(trimethylphosphine)tungsten
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Pentakis(trimethylphosphine)tungsten

Evaluate the drafted changes
The article is awesome and extremely thorough. Everything in the article is neutral and from reliable academic papers. I have some minor suggestions which are not necessarily correct but are what I feel as a reader. In the article, you’ve included a lot of reactions, which is great, but I feel a bit distracted by the following reactions with the products. For instance, the reaction with methanol can maybe exclude the subsequent reactions. I understand that, under some conditions, subsequent reactions are the reason why first reaction really matters, which I think is somehow a bit far from the topic in this place. Also, you’ve spent a lot of words discussing theoretical works on C-C bond activation, which you included the reaction in π-systems. In my opinion, this is an important feature of the compound, and you may create a new sub-label for it and put all theoretical works under this label. The reason is that when I saw ‘theoretical works’, I was expecting to see works for different reactions or the overall calculating reacting mechanisms of the compound. I would suggest putting this paragraph into ‘reactivity.’ But again, I am not firmly sure if that helps to clear your article better. I really like how you visualize all reactions with figures which is extremely helpful instead of reading those tedious chemical formulas.

Besides the comments above, here are some minor mistakes that I happen to notice:

1.     The structure of W(PMe3)4(η2-CH2PMe2)H in reactivity section has an extra Me on η2-CH2PMe2.

2.     The structure of W(PMe3)3(κ2-O2CR)(κ1-O2CR)H2 in reactivity section is missing an oxygen binding to W.

3.     Reference 29 might have a linking mistake to the original paper. I am not sure if you’re referring to https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/chin.199113228 this paper or not.

Everything else, in my opinion, is perfect and I learned a lot about the compound by doing this peer-review. Great job!