User:Lipidmonolayer1/Pnictatetrahedranes/Jdk22 Peer Review

General info
Lipidmonolayer1
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Pnictogen-substituted tetrahedranes
 * Pnictogen-substituted tetrahedranes

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead - Looks good, summarizes the article well. My only question is on whether or not you can use the phrase pnictatetrahedranes in the actual article text if you are not allowed to use it in the title.

Content - The content is relevant and up to date.

Tone - Tone seems good for the most part. I do wonder if the HHB section requires a little bit of explanation to understand why it is noted as a controversial subject.

Sources - The sources seem relevant and from a diverse series of authors. I don't think there are any additional sources that I could find from a quick search.

Organization - The content is well written and easy to read for the most part. There are a few minor errors that I caught. In the reactivity/di-tert.../dimerization section the second paragraph has a sentence that begins with "Upon addition..." is missing an "in" before the which two nickel atoms. Also, in the last paragraph of the Di-tert/ligand substitution section, you have (pftb)(pftb=pftb=...) which is a confusing series of equivalences to me. For the Di-tert/NHC section, the first sentence of the second paragraph is not a full sentence. Finally, in the theoretical work/Azatertrahedranes/bonding parameters section has the phrase less negative C-C bonds in the third paragraph, which confused me a little bit, I think the point came across fine with the following sentences, but that phrasing was a little awkward.

Images - The images were all useful, had informative captions and seemed to meet copyright standards.

Overall - The article meets notability requirements and the concept has been explained in great detail. Aside from the small changes mentioned above I don't think any other revisions are necessary.