User:Lisa1235858/Versutoxin/Kaitlynwu18 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lisa1235858


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lisa1235858/Versutoxin?veaction=edit&preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * none

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead

First two sentences of lead provide good introduction to the topic and can maybe even be combined into one sentence. Lead doesn't introduce the discussion about the structure, so that can be added to provide some context to the content of the article.

Content

The content is relevant to the topic. It deals with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps.

Tone and Balance

The content added is neutral in tone and no claims seem heavily biased.

Sources and References

All new content is backed up by a source and is properly cited in the article.

Organization

The content is well-organized and broken into distinct sections. The structure section is a bit dense due to all of the structure terminology.

Images and Media

The article has an image that enhances the article content and it is well-captioned.

For New Articles Only:

The article is supported by 6 reliable secondary sources. The article also links to many other articles so that it is more discoverable.

Overall Impressions

Overall, the article gives a brief overview of versutoxin. More detail about its nomenclature and history can probably be added to make the article more complete.