User:Lisac12/Dictyota acutiloba/Dcloset788 Peer Review

General info
Lisac12
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lisac12/Dictyota acutiloba
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Dictyota acutiloba:

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for species native to Hawaii and for the World to meet.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)  The article sentence includes author's name of citation. Probably it does not need to include if it has the reference list with a little number behind the sentence.
 * 2) * Is there anything from your review that impressed you?
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)The article discuss the species but it also mentions family name as well. If it is allowed, the name should be cite the link of Wikipedia page.
 * 5) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 6) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 7) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience) There is a need more details. However, it is appropriate writing style so far.
 * 8) Check the sources:
 * 9) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number? It has the beginning of the sentence but it should be end of the sentence.
 * 10) * Is there a reference list at the bottom? There is a reference list.
 * 11) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number? It has, but the source with a little number position should be moved.
 * 12) * What is the quality of the sources? That is a fine source.
 * 13) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 14) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article? As mentioned the above, sources linked with a little number should be an end of the sentence and it does not need to include the author name in the article sentences.
 * 15) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready? Hopefully, the species information sentences will develop as there is not enough information as well as increasing of the references.
 * 16) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? If the author would  add the more resources, it could be develop the information of sentences.
 * 17) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?