User:Lisajohn97/Anandi Gopal Joshi/Delaney barghols Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lisajohn97


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lisajohn97/Anandi Gopal Joshi


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists): Anandi Gopal Joshi

Evaluate the drafted change
I could not find the drafted changes that this user has made so far. However, I did read over the existing article in order to give the writer insight as to where she can improve it. The existing article does a good job of outlining Anandi Gopal Joshi's life from birth to death. I was impressed that information about her early years existed, because this has not been the case for some of the other Wikipedia articles I have read. I think that the article did a good job talking about the culture during the time period and how it affected this woman's life. The changes I suggest that this author apply to the article mainly involve finding more reliable sources to support the information that is already provided. First, the "academic life" section requires additional citations for verification. Lisa can start here by finding more scholarly articles about Anandi Gopal Joshi's academic life. The same problem exists for her married life. However, I do not think that this section will be as important because the purpose of this assignment is to focus on these women's work/academic achievements rather than their marital status. I think that Lisa can also do more research on Theodicia Carpenter and Ram G. Joglekar because both of these names are mentioned in the Wikipedia article but do not have their own articles. They are obviously important to the story of Anandi Gopal Joshi, but there is not much information about the impact they may have had on her. These changes would be major improvements to the article because they would make the current writing more reliable. The most important thing the author can do to improve this article is make it more detailed and reliable. The existing article provides a strong foundation for a well written Wikipedia page. I think that the author can expand and supplement the current information. I think that I have not payed enough attention to the existing sources and have instead focused on the sources I found. This article showed me that sources already cited on the page can prove very useful in my research.