User:Lisolemon/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Queer ecology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because I had never read about the topic before and was curious about it. It matters because the history of the intersection between LGBTQ+ culture and science is important but rarely talked about. My impression of the article is that it is well formatted but could use more information.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

There is a solid lead section that provides a concise overview in just a couple sentences. The content is quite extensive as it goes through an overview, history, and deeper into specific topics ending with links to related readings. The tone remains pretty neutral but there are a couple sentences that feel injected with the author's opinion. There is a long list of 34 sources at the end, proving the article is well cited and the article is well organized. There are no images or media. The talk section is pretty short filled with mainly other comments regarding Wiki Education assignments, however, there is one comment about fringe material being removed.