User:Lissampope/Morbid: A True Crime Podcast/Ltgoncal Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Lissampope


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lissampope/Morbid: A True Crime Podcast
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Morbid: A True Crime Podcast

Evaluate the drafted changes
While you don't have a lot written now for your draft (which is okay!) I hope my second pair of eyes will help you with what you currently have written and will write in the future.


 * I think that adding the different types of cases they cover within the lead was a good decision. This is useful for readers who might be interested in the podcast but don't know what types of cases they talk about and it can help them gain a better understanding.
 * The sentence "Urquhart is Kelleys aunt, but the two often refer to each other as "sisters"" would be better placed in an author's background section of the article if you so choose to write one. While the information is relevant to the authors, it isn't very relevant to the topic overall.
 * While you currently don't have a content section in your draft, a recommendation I have is to have separate sections for the different types of topics talked about in the podcasts. For example, you mention that they discuss "cases from all around the world, different time periods, and even touch on the supernatural". Separate each of these case types into different sections and talk about the different cases mention in order to give people more information about the type of true-crime podcast they are.
 * Make sure to cite where you are getting your information from, even when in the draft phase, to ensure that you don't get confused about where each piece of information is coming from
 * I suggest moving the sentence "Urquhart is an autopsy technician/aspiring author and Kelley is a hairdresser." to directly after your very first sentence because it would help with the flow of your lead.
 * The overall tone of your lead is neutral which is good and exactly what Wikipedia wants. I don't detect any bias when reading.
 * Small grammar errors and confusing wording.
 * For example, "Kelleys" should be "Kelley's".
 * The wording of "The podcast first debuted in May 2018, currently having a total of over 200 episodes" is a bit weird so I would change the last part of the sentence to say "The podcast first debuted in May 2018 and currently has a total of over 200 episodes".
 * Change the slash in "technician/aspiring author" to "technician and aspiring author"