User:ListasBot/old talk pages

Talk:Eduardo Dato y Iradier
Talk:Eduardo Dato y Iradier (old revision) → Talk:Eduardo Dato e Iradier

this article is full of bugs: he was only from 1899-1900 and 1902-03 minister of interior / justice. I'm pretty sure he hasn't been the first conservative Prime Minister and didn't definetly not enter this position in 1910. Look here: (and translate with Google) --84.191.212.178 11:11, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

there are some more different informations to the Weblink --84.191.212.178 11:29, 10 April 2006 (UTC)

Eduardo Dato y Iradier?
In Castilian, i ts actual name is Eduardo Dato e Iradier. Spanish language rules prohibit the particle "y" before a word which begins with an "i". --SMP - talk (en)  -  talk (ca)  14:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

It's a stupid rule, but if it's true!... (Personally I wouldn't follow it.) G.-M. Cupertino (talk) 17:37, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Fejzi Alizoti
Talk:Fejzi Alizoti (old revision) → Talk:Fejzi Bej Alizoti

I think in this article it is unambiguously said that we are talking about western Macedonia as a part of the occupied territory of Yugoslavia. It is impossible to talk about a former Yugoslav republic in 1941! Andres 17:36, 6 Sep 2003 (UTC)

It seems that Alizoti, at least for Kosovo, included only Muslims to Albanians. Andres 07:15, 2 Oct 2003 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:34, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Feroze Khan
Talk:Feroze Khan (old revision) → Talk:Feroz Khan

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 17:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Fezensac family
Talk:Fezensac family (old revision) → Talk:County of Fézensac

Regarding the merger. When I started the article, I took the same approach as was already present in other noble family articles on the Wikipedia, where there might be several separate articles for the family, the title, and the placename: for instance - Montmorency (family), Duc de Montmorency (title), and the town that gave the name to both. Presently, I think that there is enough difference between the County of Fezensac, the town, the family, and the title. I may be wrong about that, and if so, please, let me see my error. Thanks to all contributors. Anchorite 03:31, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I think the town and the county are distinct for sure, but I fail to see that the family (which is obscure) and the title are very independent from the County. If an article is created on the title/family in the future it will have to be much broader in scope to justify its independent existence. Srnec (talk) 03:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)