User:ListeningLearner29/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Myosin

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

This article discusses a critical motor protein superclass we have been discussing in my course. This motor protein class is responsible for every muscle movement we make! At first glance, the page seems well organized and sufficiently detailed.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section gives a nice description of this motor protein family, but includes a lot of information not discussed in detail in the article. The contents of the article itself feel somewhat random. Several types of myosin are listed but not described at all. Genetics and paramyosin have their own sections which feel haphazard at best. The genetics section title is confusing, and should read closer to "Major Myosin Genes in Humans." The overall tone of the article feels neutral and unbiased. Many recent citations are used, and they seem to be linked correctly. The overall grammar and writing in the article is good. The organization, i.e. the major subsections, are very random, and not at the major details of this motor protein. The images in the article are very nice and informative. They seem relevant overall. Few if any recent conversations exist on the talk page for this article. It is of interest to the molecular biology project. The article as a whole is underdeveloped. The page would benefit from updated findings, an organizational overhaul, and a clearer guiding summary.