User:Literacystudent/Reading/Nlavinier Peer Review

Hi, I noticed your lead might be missing an introductory sentence. You did a great job describing the how and why of neuroimages, but again lacked the definition of neuroimages to describe your topic. I also noticed there were no major sections explicitly identified with bolded font. The content added is concise. Your article is presented in a neutral tone. The organization my need some adjustment... you can do so by just adding more details about your topic. I think the strength of your article is how it it identifies and explain how the brain works during reading. Very fascinating !!!

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)