User:Little Tears/Hnoss/Dogmom2005 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(little tears)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
The Article seems to have a good flow of information and well cited sources, the original article lacks information and Little tears has been able to find a good amount of information on the topic that has not been introduced to the article. the current references in the article are hard to follow and there is not a clear path to what is being referenced.