User:Littleolive oil/sandbox

Thoughts on AE and arb clarification:

If an editor has to show diffs to prove innocence diffs must be provided to show guilt. With out diffs and specific evidence of non complaint behaviour an editor cannot know what to correct. Further in my experience general terms for misbehaviour like tendentious editing and battle ground behaviour are easily open to abuse in part because what constitutes these behaviour is subjective and also the terms can be used to remove editors with out specific evidence. Sanctionable behaviour must be specifically identified.

AE should be judged by a board of 3 editors already identified before cases are posted. There could be multiple teams of 3 editors, two who are editors and one admin., all who have over 8,000 edits and who are good standing at the time of any  AE the team adjudicates. If the AE decision is contested an editor may ask for another team to adjudicate a second AE in which the evidence is looked at in isolation of the first AE. This would take weight off the responsibilities arbs face since they would no longer deal with most appeals.