User:Littleteddy/Standards

I have decided that I will develop some RfA standards similar to Useight's when !voting in RfAs. When I oppose RfAs I could say 'Sorry, fails my standard: Number of Edits'.

Number of edits
or and
 * 1000 Mainspace edits
 * 500 Mainspace edits
 * 500 Project space edits


 * Evidence of contact with other users (e.g. high use of user talk or talk pages)


 * Good (80%+) use of edit summaries


 * Over 3000 edits

Activity
or and
 * At least 4 months of active contribution
 * 6000+ edits
 * At least 3 months of active contribution

Conduct

 * Has not been warned for non-vandalism edits in the last 4 months


 * No (non-accidental) vandalism in the last 6 months

or
 * No blocks in the past year
 * No blocks since becoming an editor (where an editor has been here for less than a year)

I don't care if...

 * The nominee runs a bot
 * The nominee self-nominates
 * The nominee is willing to add him/herself to CAT:AOR
 * The nominee has edited in the userspace a lot
 * The nominee focusses on WP:AfD, WP:RFPP etc.
 * The nominee has few edits to WP:AIV
 * The nominee runs on a three-revert rule or a one-revert rule
 * The nominee has gone through admin coaching

But I do care if...

 * The nominee answers only a few of the optional questions
 * The nominee has only been fighting vandalism rather than being an 'all-rounder'
 * The nominee is not a member of any WikiProjects
 * I feel that I should apply Ignore All Rules in supporting/opposing a nominee