User:Liv Davis/Environmental disaster/HRVEF Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Liv Davis


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Environmental disaster


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Environmental disaster

Evaluate the drafted changes
Under climate change and disaster risks section, there are only one or two sentences, which I think can be greatly expanded upon. Who are the 49 countries most exposed to disaster risk? And why so? What conditions would cause the list of 49 countries to change, either by addition or removal of specific countries? What are potential "concerted efforts" in the long-term; what do the doubting environmental groups recommend instead of current mitigation practices? In the introduction section, it might also be useful to describe why the analysis of environmental disasters might be beneficial for developing a scientific, environmental, or cultural perspective on destructive human behaviors. I think the article is well written, and organized, but needs more contend in order to accomplish its goal of providing holistic information on the topic.