User:Livg21/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Presidential Climate Action Plan

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it incorporates a recent topic we have been focusing on in class. This article matters because it involves climate policy that has been changed based on the president in recent years. My first impression is that the article is brief and could use some more information.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead section introduces the President Climate Action Plan, who created it, and the purpose of it. Also, within this lead section, there is already a link provided as a resource.

The content of this article seems to be up to date. First off, the article was edited last month. In addition to that, the article includes how the Action Plan was altered based on the most recent presidents. It mentions Obama, Trump, and also Biden.

The article feels very unbiased, as it mainly just states the facts. There is no mention of one president being better than one another. It simply explains that history of the plan.

The sources seem to be scattered throughout the article, which gives me confidence that the author relied on a variety of sources for this information. The sources seem to be from websites that pertain to the US government, but there is an article from the New York Times that might be less official or reliable.

The article is well written and focuses on the facts, without inserting any opinions. The writing seems to be concise and gets the point across. I did not encounter any major errors.

The article does not have any images or media to enhance the content, but there is a box on the page that can help the readers navigate from section to section.

The article seems to be quite short and concise, but gives the general information about the Climate Action Plan and its history with different presidents. I wonder if it would be useful for the article to go more in depth about the plan itself. I would say it is fairly well developed, and uses incredibly reliable and official sources as evidence. This makes me more willing to read it and want to use it as an education tool for myself.