User:LivyRosa/Carbon farming/Morgan.b18 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

LivyRosa


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:LivyRosa/Carbon farming
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Carbon farming

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead

The lead hasn't been updated based on the new content added, but it is neutral and describes the topic well.

Content

There was not a lot of added content but it was neutral. More content could be added in the various subsections, bamboo received the most editing but some of the smaller sections could benefit from more information, such as organic mulch, seaweed farming and hybrids.

Sources and References

The new sources provided are up to date and relevant to the article. Most of the sources are reliable, but I'd recommend reviewing a few especially http://www.carboncycle.org/carbon-farming/, and https://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/oct/29/carbon-farming-its-a-nice-theory-but-dont-get-your-hopes-up as a peer reviewed source may be a better option compared to a website and news article.

Organization

This article could be better organized, there are 16 sections and I suggest placing some of them together for clarity. It was difficult to find the added content as the existing article was copy and pasted into the sandbox and edited from there. Only keeping the added content may be helpful in keeping track of what you personally added in your sandbox.

Images and Media

No extra images were added.

Overall impressions

This article is well written and there are no major grammar or spelling errors. It could be better organized and more content is needed to see a significant change from the existing article.