User:Lizziecalero/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Methanobacterium

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article to evaluate because this is the article my group will be working on. My preliminary impression of this article was that it is a great article, but it has a lot of room for improvement. A lot of more detailed information can be added to enhance the strength of this article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

This article discusses Methanobacterium, and the lead includes an introductory sentence that clearly describes the article's topic. The lead does not include a description of the major sections of the article, which should be added. The lead is concise, but could include more detailed information. The content of the article is very relevant to the article's topic. The edit history shows recent edits, so I can assume that the article is pretty up to date. The article is missing content that could be relevant, such as Methanobacterium's virulence or where the bacteria can be found in nature. The article is very neutral and doesn't show signs of bias or opinion. All of the information in the article is cited/referenced by reliable sources. On the talk page, the article is rated a Level 5 Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Overall, the article is informative and well-written, but can be strengthened by adding more content.