User:Lizzyem/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Feminism Sexology

Feminist sexology

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article because it relates to the class that I am taking apart of, and I thought that it would be an interesting topic to read about. This article matters because it is about how human sexuality relates to women and its different forms, it is interesting to see the many different forms of human sexuality. My preliminary impression of it was that it sounded very formal. It did sound biased at some points but for the most part it was a very informational article.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead felt like a good lead for introduction female sexology, but it didn't feel like it explain everything that was going to be talked about in the article. I think a bit more of information in the lead could've been helpful for me to understand what was going to be talked about in the rest of the article.

The article deals with women and talks about the history of women, the article feels biased at certain points when they bring up the hardships that women endure. When reading, I did feel more like I had to "pity" women.

The sources mainly come from books and quotations from the books. The link's work nicely and fit well into the article. I think some more sources from different forms of media could've been used.

The writing in the article is very well done. It feels very informative and gives a clear understanding of the topic that they are trying to talk about, It is clear and easy to read.

There are no images, which means that there is many words to read, which made it hard for me to focus and pay attention to all the paragraphs that I was reading. I think adding a couple of pictures would be beneficial for this article, in order to catch people's attention even more.

The talk page is giving good feedback about the article and how to improve.

Overall, the article was good, but it just felt biased and needed more sources from different medias to strengthen what they were talking about.