User:Ljasoncsusb2/User:Caitmarie12/Paulo Nazareth/Ljasoncsusb2 Peer Review

Article has good lead and content.

If possible add media.

More notable artworks should be included.

For the section regarding exhibitions, it seems a bit odd that the years are in reverse order. If there isn't a specific reason for this it should probably be from earliest to latest.

Links work for the citations.

Overall good tone and formatting.

Bibliography needs work, should include citations.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)