User:Ljc22b/Low culture/Airalia Peer Review

General info
Ljc22b, Pangalan.ko
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Low culture sandbox
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Low culture

Evaluate the drafted changes
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * No
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, the part about culture theory can be expanded on in the article
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * Concise

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, but I think the history section needs some more sentences to tie it back to the topic... Some of seems a little out of place but I think could be explained more (specifically referencing the love magic section, not sure how it ties to low culture).
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * Missing content, but there are section headings to fill in
 * Missing content, but there are section headings to fill in

Tone and Balance
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added neutral?
 * Yes
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No
 * No

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 *  NO THERE ARE NO REFERENCES!!!!!! Make sure to add them!! 
 * Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes
 * Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes the sections are well done

Overall:

I think what has been added is good, but there are no references at all, which is concerning. Some of the history part seems to be out of context, so please make sure to explain exactly how some of the things mentioned is low culture (folk music?). The section headings you have seem interesting, so I'm excited to read what gets filled in. I think a lot more images and media can be added to the article, especially in the "Popular Examples" section.