User:Ljkennedy03/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Name of article: Coco (2017 film)
 * Briefly describe why you have chosen this article to evaluate.
 * I chose this article because of the theme of death and the cultural aspect of the Day of the Dead.

Lead

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Yes it discusses who produced the movie and basic plot.
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Yes, it does.
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Yes, it doesn't cover the characters and actors in the lead.
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
 * The lead is very concise.

Content

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes
 * Is the content up-to-date?
 * Yes
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
 * No
 * Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?
 * Yes and it is related to a historically underrepresented population and topics by discussing the celebration of the day of the dead.

Tone and Balance

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article neutral?
 * Yes, it is very factual.
 * Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * No, it is very neutral article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are over represented, or underrepresented?
 * No, it is not over represented or underrepresented.
 * Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
 * No, it is very factual about the movie.

Sources and References

 * Guiding questions


 * Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Yes
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Yes they are very through
 * Are the sources current?
 * Yes, all sites are current
 * Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
 * Yes they are written by a various number of people. Yes they do!
 * Check a few links. Do they work?
 * Yes they do!

Organization

 * Guiding questions


 * Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
 * Yes, it is easily separated so sections are not too long
 * Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
 * No
 * Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
 * Yes it very well organized

Images and Media

 * Guiding questions


 * Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
 * Yes
 * Are images well-captioned?
 * Yes
 * Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
 * Yes
 * Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
 * Yes there are good quality pictures used.

Checking the talk page

 * Guiding questions


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There are clarification questions like to use Dias de los Muertos or to use Dia de Muertos
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * C-class rating and is a part of WikiProjects
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * No, it seems like all the information is there

Overall impressions

 * Guiding questions


 * What is the article's overall status?
 * C-Class status
 * What are the article's strengths?
 * That it contains a plethora of knowledge on the film.
 * How can the article be improved?
 * The article could be improved in the aspect of outlining everything in the lead
 * How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?
 * The article is well developed

Optional activity

 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback

with four tildes — ~


 * Link to feedback: