User:Lka002/Hippocampus kuda/Jar07016 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

LKa002


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lka002/Hippocampus kuda - Wikipedia


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Hippocampus kuda - Wikipedia

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Hello! Here is my peer review for you:

1.) 	Each section of the article seems to contain short and easy to understand facts, most of which appear to be cited properly. It is structured well and presented in a way that is simple to follow. The tone was overall neutral, and I didn’t spot any attempts of persuasion. I think it does a good job of conveying basic information about the species, but it could definitely use more content in each section.

2./3.)     Some of the changes I would suggest are adding on to the lead, and just adding more information to each section. I think the most important change you should focus on would be the threats it faces and what people are doing to conserve it. It seems like the lead only describes the name of the species, but not really everything discussed in the article so you could add onto that a little bit. You could also go back and try to cite some of the information that wasn’t already cited or remove it and replace it with more relevant information. I’m not sure how much information you would find but, if possible, you could also add more content to the biology section about the species or add any new habitats in which it has been spotted.

4.) 	In one of my sources, I also found some new habitats in which my species was found. I’m also planning to focus mostly on its conservation and threats section since it is the least developed.

5.)	I did notice that in the “biology” section and “conservation status” section, there were not any wikilinks.

6.)	I thought that your edits so far seemed well-written and the source you chose seemed reliable. Just make sure to add as many reliable sources as you can to find lots of diverse information.