User:Lkirkley/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Article title
 * Japanese-Western Eclectic Architecture


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * The article's content is relevant to the topic, however it really brushes by the topic and instead produces many pictures that relate to the type of architecture that is being presented without discussing the elements that are present.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes, it is written neutrally
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes it does
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * The citations are from various forms of Japanese and Architectural History
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes I believe that it does.
 * Sources
 * Britannica Source
 * JSTOR Source
 * Yes I believe that it does.
 * Sources
 * Britannica Source
 * JSTOR Source
 * JSTOR Source

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Folk Victorian Architecture


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Yes, but briefly describes the topic without going into too much detail.
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Sort of, there are many different hyperlinks that are present, and there are only 2 citations.
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * I do not think that they are reliable
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes, I believe so.
 * Sources
 * Home Reference
 * Gale Academic
 * Yes, I believe so.
 * Sources
 * Home Reference
 * Gale Academic
 * Gale Academic

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Ornamentalism


 * Article Evaluation
 * Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
 * Sort of, it is a really small article
 * Is it written neutrally?
 * Yes
 * Does each claim have a citation?
 * Yes
 * Are the citations reliable?
 * Yes it is from an encyclopedia
 * Does the article tackle one of Wikipedia's equity gaps (coverage of historically underrepresented or misrepresented populations or subjects)?
 * Yes I believe that it does.
 * Sources
 * JSTOR
 * University of Chicago Press
 * Yes I believe that it does.
 * Sources
 * JSTOR
 * University of Chicago Press
 * University of Chicago Press