User:Lkshephe/Military psychology/Zclayt Peer Review

Concerning the amount of information and references that you chose to use in your sandbox, I would recommend to include a bit more into your sandbox. I was not able to tell and differentiate between certain parts of your sandbox concerning your article body and your lead paragraph. I think that you could maybe label or separate these two parts from each other as well. The information included was well worded and great information, I just would have added a little more detail and information. I also noticed a lot of bolded areas and texts in your sandbox that I was not sure was edits or original data. I would make that a little more specific as well.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)