User:Llaineyvann/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Mighty girl effect

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because the Mighty Girl Effect is something that I am interested in, especially because I am a first born daughter.

Evaluate the article
The lead section starts out with a good definition of what the Mighty Girl Effect is. The rest of the lead section is not very detailed and it doesn't have a lot of information. It does not talk about the different sections that will be discussed in the article. There is no information in the lead section that is not present in the article. The lead section is concise, but it could have some more information. The articles content is relevant to the topic and the information is up to date as far as I can tell. I feel like there is a lot more to this topic that is not represented throughout the article and that there could be more information added. This topic deals with women who have historically been marginalized and undervalued/underrepresented. I think that the article is neutral and there is no biases that stand out to me. There is no persuasion for either side in this article and I think all of the information is represented equally. I do not see any minority viewpoints that are mentioned in the article. All of the facts are cited by quality sources. The sources are current, relevant to the topic, and very informational. Some of the information provided could have a better source. I noticed that there were some magazine articles and a linkedin article on there as well. It seems like there are a lot of the same authors for different sources and while they do seem to all have a different and diverse background, I think more sources from different people could be added. The links do seem to be working. The article is a little difficult to read and understand at times. There is not a whole lot of information in the article. There are no grammar or spelling errors that I noticed and the organization is clear and the subtopics are clearly marked. There could be more subtopics and sections. There are no images in the article at all. There is not a lot of talk about this article, although one contributor talked about how they are having a hard time including information in a resourceful way. This article is part of a WikiProject and it is rated as Start-class. This topic is not something that we have discussed in class and even if we did, I feel like this article is lacking information. The overall status of this article is Start-class. It has good information throughout the article, there just needs to be more information, explanations, examples, etc. and I think it is underdeveloped.