User:Lllangd1/sandbox

Tenoch

 * This article has no cited sources.
 * The talk page has no ongoing conversations, the only post is from 2008 about translating an article from the es.wiki.
 * This article is a part of the wiki project Mesoamerica.
 * Rated as a Stub-class on the quality scale.
 * Rated as High-Importance on the importance scale.
 * Does not seem biased but lacks adequate and pertinent information.
 * The article is structured and worded very closely to a passage here https://dillonsandhu.weebly.com/leaders.html (Not sure if this passage was taken from wiki or vice versa)
 * New world encyclopedia names Tenoch as one of the 12 rulers of Tenochtitlan and it's legendary founder. But I find no other reference to Tenoch in this article or sources.
 * Aztec history's website notes Tenoch's death in 1370, opposed to the 1375 listed in the wiki.
 * This website names Tenoch as the first ruler of Tenochtitlan and states his speculated death was in 1370.
 * Tenoch's father was Iztacmixcoatl, who had a total of seven sons with two wives. The Tenochtitlan people were originally referred to as Tenochca, then the Mexica.
 * Tenochtitlan was founded by Tenoch, Iztacmixcoatl's second son, based on a sign from the sun-god Huitzilopochtli
 * Tenochtitlan was founded around 1325. During the migration from Aztlan, Tenoch was an early Aztec Chief.

Summary
This article is very lacking in both the quantity and quality of information. There are no cited sources, and published works referencing Tenoch appear to be very limited. The structure and phrasing is very close to a text by Dillon Sandhu, although I cannot find a date on his article to check if it predates the wiki text. The two published works I found, that referenced Tenoch, contained no more than a paragraph about him.

Guidelines/Questions to consider

 * Complete the "Evaluating Articles and Sources" training (linked below).
 * Create a section in your sandbox titled "Article evaluation" where you'll leave notes about your observations and learnings.
 * Choose an article on Wikipedia related to your course to read and evaluate. As you read, consider the following questions (but don't feel limited to these):
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Choose at least 1 question relevant to the article you're evaluating and leave your evaluation on the article's Talk page. Be sure to sign your feedback with four tildes — ~.