User:Lm1403/Wellness (alternative medicine)/Alannacronk Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username)


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

 Alannas Notes 

It seems like the "History" section is almost exclusively written using only one source which doesn't feel ideal. It just feels like a book report on that one NYT article, rather than a summary of lots of knowledge about wellness.

All the sentences in the "promotion of Psuedo science" section also just feel really disconnected from one another.