User:Lnatry/sandbox

"Article Selection"

"Article evaluation"

Everything in the article is fairly relevant. There are no random facts put in; they all seem to have to do with the same topic. I am unsure of any recent developments, but most of the information dates most recently to 2017, so it seems that most of the information is up-to-date. The only improvement I would make is to organize it a little differently. There is also not a whole lot of information on the site itself.

The article is extremely neutral; it states facts. There is not a whole lot of information on the site.

The actual citations do not actually work. Most of the links do not work and lead to sites that do not prove to hold any support or citation for their own facts; however, each fact is cited.

There are no conversations in the talk section. One writer wrote about an edit they made, but that is all that is featured on the site.