User:Localdenizen/citing sources

Diogenes heteropsammicola is a species of hermit crab that lives within "walking corals" of the genera Heterocyathus and Heteropsammia.



These coral have an internal cavity that is typically occupied by a symbiotic sipunculan worm; in the crab's habitat in the Ōshima Straight south of Amami Ōshima, it is often found inside the corals instead.

Article evaluation
Shuar language
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? Everything was relevant to the Shuar language, but the section about the influence of the church was distracting to me. It seemed out of place given the lack of information in other sections.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? Mostly, but the church section also seemed a bit biased in favor of the church. There are likely perspectives of the situation that are more anti-church, but I don't know this for sure. If there are, they should be represented in the article, too.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? As stated, if there are perspectives that are less pro-church, they should be represented in the article alongside more pro-church views.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? Yes, the citations are all accurate.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference?        There are some facts in the introduction that are not cited. A few facts in the history section are also uncited.
 * Where does the information come from?  Ethnologue, Glottolog, Saving Languages: An introduction to language revitilization Grenoble (2006), Unrepresented Nations and People Organization (UNPO), "Alternative phonemicizing in Jivaro" (Turner, 1958)
 * Are these neutral sources?         They seem fairly neutral, although some are geared towards revitalization and indigenous rights.
 * If biased, is that bias noted? No.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? There is no indication that information is outdated, but more information about all parts of the language's grammar could be added, e.g., more phonetics/phonology, morphology, word order and syntax, etc.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? No conversations were found.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is rated as Stub-Class and is a part of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It is much more cursory, lacking basic information about the structure of the language and example sentences, and it is a bit more focused on the Shuar people rather than the language.