User:Locke9k/Sandbox

=Glass transition intro=

The glass transition, is a continuous and reversible process wherin the viscosity of a liquid or soft solid dramatically but smoothly increases to a degree such that it behaves as a rigid solid (a glass) over practical timescales of observation. This process is also known as vitrification.

The glass-transition temperature Tg of a material characterizes the range of temperatures over which this glass transition occurs (as an experimental definition, typically marked as 100 s of relaxation time). It is always lower than the melting temperature, Tm, of the crystalline state of the material, if one exists.

=Antiplasticizer= Antiplasticizers are additives that suppress the glass transition temperature of a material while increasing the modulus of the material in its glassy state. Antiplasticizers are so named because of this stiffening effect, which contrasts with the softening induced by plasticizer additives. Examples antiplasticizers include the use of glycerol to antiplasticize trehalose and the antiplasticizing effect of water on some food products.

Effects of Antiplasticizers
In addition to reducing the glass transition temperature and stiffening the material in its glass state, antiplasticizers have several other affects on material properties. First, they reduce the fragility of the glass transition, meaning that they broaden the temperature range over which the glass transition occurs. Second, they typically reduce the Debye-Waller factor of the glass.

=AFD wording= This article appears to cover a non-notable topic. It contains only one reference, which is to a fringe source. A google search does not reveal a sufficient body of reliable sources addressing this topic to establish notability; in fact, this editor can find none at all at this time. Since the topic has apparently not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", it does not meet the general notability guideline and is a good candidate for deletion. From another viewpoint, the article covers a relatively minor aspect of a fringe topic, and is therefore on its face non-notable, and also possibly an instance of WP:Undue weight.

2007saar

Party comparisons
The following table lists some political ideologies most often associated with the five U.S. political parties with the most members, as well the official party positions on a number of reformist issues where positions diverge. Nuances may be found in the parties' respective platforms. Not all members of a party subscribe to all of its officially held positions, the usual degree of variation generally being higher for the larger parties. Note that party members may hold different views on legislation to be enacted at the state or federal levels.

Political parties talk page
I have again reworked the positions table in order to provide a more accurate, verifiable description of the party positions. Specifically, I have addressed several problems. First, a simple yes/no response is often inadequate to accurately reflect the official party position on a topic, and in some cases can be misleading. Second, although there was reason to favor the use of red and green position color-coding for clarity, the color-coding is faced with the issue that it is fundamentally dependent on how the topic is framed; ie., by changing the topic wording one can switch the color of the parties. The coloration therefore does not provide useful information in this case, and is particularly problematic from a neutrality standpoint since green is commonly viewed as good, while read is commonly viewed as negative or dangerous. As with the yes/no problem, it also tends to oversimplify the issue. Addressing both of these issues requires changing the format of the table to contain a brief blurb descriptive of the party's position. For reasons that have been discussed in previous years on this talk page, these positions are restricted to those expressed in the parties' platforms, with citations to the parties' platforms and where possible and necessary to independent third parties clarifying the meaning of the platform planks. However, in the current format this revision faces the problem of severely overcrowding the table and potentially rendering unreadable. Given this situation, the new table is restricted to the Republican and Democratic parties on the following bases. Given the relative memberships of these two parties to the other three parties previously included in this table, it is likely that the minor parties were being given undue weight.

=Reflist=