User:LofgrenSFSUenglish465/The Strange Bird: A Borne Story/Ytan11sf Peer Review

General Info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?
 * LofgrenSFSUenglish465


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LofgrenSFSUenglish465/The_Strange_Bird:_A_Borne_Story?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template#/editor/0


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * NA

Evaluation
Lead: The lead introduce the article well. One suggestion is that the author might want to include the influence (such as awards, volume sold, etc) so that readers can understand the significant of the article.

Content: A lot of content is added and they are very useful for the reader. One critique is that the Thematic Interpretations section might have been stressed too much. In my *personal opinion*, it is most welcomed that the interpretations of the story are introduced, but deep analysis of said interpretations should be avoided. Besides that, the author might want to consider adding the impact of the book.

Tone and Balance: The tone of this sentence "The ways in which we differentiate species i.e. how we think of differences between humans and animals can only be understood in a context of ecological violence, and this novella gives an anecdotal example of new ways of thinking about kinship with nature" might appear persuasive.

Source and Reference: The sources of the article are reliable.

Organization: The organization is generally good although there is a few grammatical error here and there. The last paragraph of the plot summary might be best to be integrated into other paragraphs rather than an independent paragraph so that it is more coherent to the story.

Overall: The article is strong overall.