User:Logangorlando/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Island studies

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose this article because I was born and raised on an island so anything to do with studying them is interesting to me.

Evaluate the article
Lead Section

This article has a great lead section. The first sentence immediately get into what island studies is and also provides the scientific name for it (Nissology).

Content

This article offers a good range of content that is relatively up to date, but could maybe use some updating. The content is all relevant to island studies, and it doesn't seem like there is any content that is missing or doesn't belong in the article.

Tone and balance

I feel as thought this article had good tone and balance. All of the information and content was presented in a neutral viewpoint. Not that there would be much here that I could be persuaded on, but nonetheless, I didn't feel persuaded.

Sources and references

All of the sources seem to be credible and reliable sources, and all of the links function like they should. They are all super up to date; the most recent ones are from earlier this year

Organization and writing quality

This article is very well written and very well organized.

Images and media

This article does not offer any images or media unfortunately. I think that it would make the article look more visually appealing but I also don't see that any images or media would be necessary.

Talk page discussion

This article doesn't have any discussions in the talk page unfortunately. It also hasn't been rated or added into any WikiProjects.

Overall impressions

I think that this was a very well written article. The strength are the long list of credible and up to date sources that are provided. It is a very well developed article.