User:Lolagrayy/sandbox

Evaluating content


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * I found everything in the article to be relevant to the topic at hand, no out of place information.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * With this being my first few times reading over the article, I did not think of much that should be added. Although, I did not see much/any at all of talk about Flagstaff being a dark sky city and that is why Pluto was found (probably).
 * What else could be improved?
 * N/A

Evaluating tone


 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is neutral and is based upon historical facts and operations now on the telescope.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * None are glaring out to be overly represented.

Evaluating sources


 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * I did find a few links that were broken in which should definitely be fixed or taken off. The sources that did work did seem beneficial to the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * The references do seem noble and many of the hyperlinks that are in the article are to go to another wiki page to get more information on a related topic.

Checking the talk page

Now take a look at how others are talking about this article on the talk page.


 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is a very limited amount of talk about this topic, the most recent was from almost 2 years ago.
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * This is part of 3 WikiProjects in which are all of Mid-Importance.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * Wiki gives more background knowledge about the observatory than was discussed in class… only because it was mentioned for about 15 seconds in class.