User:Lonelychild1/Urban ecology/Cbutron Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

EstherM04, Lonelychild1, and Muhammadtoure1999


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Lonelychild1/Urban ecology
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Urban ecology

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:


 * No, the lead has not been updated to reflect the new content.
 * Yes, the lead includes an introductory sentence that concisely describes the article’s topic.
 * The lead does not include a brief description of the article’s major sections.
 * The lead does not include information that is not present in the article.
 * The lead is concise.

Content:


 * The content added is relevant to the topic.
 * The content added is up to date.
 * More content with specific sources can be added to improve the information.
 * The article does not deal with one of the Wikipedia’s equity gaps. It does not address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics.

Tone and Balance:


 * The content is added neutral.
 * There are not any claims that appear heavily biased.
 * There are no viewpoints that are over represented.
 * The content added does not attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position.

Sources and References:


 * Not all of the new content is backed by a reliable secondary source.
 * The cited content does accurately reflect the cited sources.
 * Better sources such as scientific research articles should be cited rather than website articles.

Organization:


 * The content added is well written.
 * Some of the content contains grammatical errors which can be improved.
 * The content is well organized.

Images and Media:


 * The article does not include images