User:Loops.49/sandbox

Everything in this article appeared to be relevant because everything talked about human migration, from what is human migration is to the theories of migration. The article appeared to be neutral because it was just stating facts, not really giving a biased view-point. Each view point seemed to have a basic understanding to it, nothing seemed to be over evaluated, however, there were some points which could've been better explained, or where they could've added more information. The citation links all appeared to work, however some sources had very little information that was needed for the article. Some information appeared to be a bit out-dated, however most of it was up- to- date. The information all appeared to come from a reliable source because all the cites are well cited and come from sources with concrete information. Wikipedia discusses this topic in a very uniformed way, while in class it bounces from subject to subject, however it still stays on topic.