User:Lopezvilan/Ninja lanternshark/Andrew.gans Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Lead
N/A

Content
- All the content of the article seems relevant and is well written

- I think the bioluminescence section could use a little reworking to include more details about how it achieves bioluminescence and perhaps organize it with a behavior heading.

Tone and Balance
- I think the balance is good, however I believe some of the text could be reworded to sound less assertive since there are not that many citations given.

Sources and References
- The sources/references seem well chosen but I think they should be cited more throughout the body of the text of the draft sections.

Organization
- the article draft is well organized