User:Lopezvilan/Ninja lanternshark/Julia Serra Peer Review

General info
Lopezvilan
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Lopezvilan/Ninja lanternshark
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ninja lanternshark

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think relevant and concise information has been added to further the articles discussion of the ninja lanternshark. For clarity, I was wondering if the sentence in your sandbox in reference to the naming of the organism is something you deleted or plan to add, as I do not see it on the wiki article. I believe overall more information could be added in regards to topics such as the organisms ecology, reproduction, feeding habits, etc. But the information added to the description section is very relevant, well cited, and concise. The article itself takes on a neutral tone as well. I also believe the type section heading could be renamed to something more specific to the detail of the paragraph.