User:Lopezvilan/Ninja lanternshark/Malloryfitzhenry Peer Review

General info
Ninja lanternshark
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Ninja lanternshark
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Ninja lanternshark

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

I think that you guys need to check over your annotated bibliography to ensure that it is in a consistent format. I think some of styles of citation are different.

Maybe more could be added to the section on origination of scientific name. I appreciated the inclusion of both the researcher and where the name comes from, but I feel as if the section could be expanded. The Jaws inclusion is fun and niche!

I feel like the information in Type could be moved to the origination of scientific name.