User:Lorelie18/sandbox


 * Name of article: Paleolithic religion
 * I chose this article to evaluate because learning some things about Paleolithic religion is something that interests me because its not something I learned about and I would like to learn about it.

Lead
When reading the first lines of this article, it had a clear and understanding of what Paleolithic religion means. This article does describe major sections in which it is discussed individually and describing more about it, although it is overly detailed. This article even represents a timeline describing the occurrences. I think this article is concise and a bit overly detailed but it has clear information describing and discussing the background topic and covering each information.

Content
When reading this article, I found the content relevant to the topic. It is clearly directing the meaning and adding sections related to the overall topic. This article discusses each section overly detailed because it mentions certain things that should not be the center of defying the meaning of the topic and background of it.

This article when reading it, it is helpful to get information on Paleolithic religion but seems to contain more information than needed; such as overly detailed in sections.

Tone and Balance
This article does contain a neutral perspective on the topic. It does mention side perspectives of religion from other people but none in which it is heavily biased, it discusses peoples thoughts and reasonings about religion. The viewpoints presented in this article are overrepresented, tends to over represent the concept on the topic and mentioning of other sections. This article not attempt to persuade readers to take sides in favor, it mentions scientist perspectives in their critical thinking based off the topics.

Sources and References
This article contained more than one source of information to back up facts mentioned. The sources mentioned in the article do reflect the topic because the mentioning of different section pertaining to the topic leading to different connections related to the topic. Some of these sources are not current up to date. I find the sources and references reliable due to the topic, because it discusses and backups the evidence about the facts.

Organization
Reading this article, I found it easy and consistent to read throughout the page. The facts behind the religions mentioned in this article it is easy to understand and follow through. Reading through the article, I did not seem to find any spelling or grammar errors. This article has two sections reflecting back to the topic, discussing major parts of it throughout the section leading to the discussion of the main topic. This article did contain more information and overly detail about religion and sided perspectives about them but it was clear to understand.

Images and Media
This article does contain images based off the topic, even when discussing the topic throughout the sections; images are placed in-between some sentences describing what the picture is and has/was been used for or as. Images are well captioned as well as visually appealing.

Checking the talk page
The types of conversations in the talk page that I see is suggestions of what should be added onto the article and the things that need to be removed or fixed. This article has been rated a level 5 and is a part of WikiProject Archaeology.

Overall impressions
The article tends to maintain enough information based off the topic, but what I do notice is this article tends to repeat information throughout the article. I feel that's something that needs to be worked on and not be overly detailed and focus more on facts.