User:LostNelpaso/Full range leadership model/LostNelpaso Peer Review

Transformational leadership style

Scholars Mandell and Pherwani identified four attributes of transformational leaders, which align with the four I's of transformational leadership:

1.     Idealized Influence (II) : Transformational leaders serve as role models and create a sense of trust and admiration among their followers. They set a high standard of ethical conduct and inspire others to emulate their actions.

2.     Inspirational Motivation (IM) : Transformational leaders inspire and motivate their followers by creating a compelling vision of the future and articulating it in a way that generates enthusiasm and commitment. They communicate a clear and appealing vision that instills a sense of purpose and excitement among the team.

3.     Intellectual Stimulation (IS) : Transformational leaders encourage creativity, innovation, and critical thinking among their followers. They stimulate intellectual growth by challenging the norms, fostering an environment of open communication, and encouraging individuals to think independently and creatively.

4.     Individualized Consideration (IC) : Transformational leaders recognize and attend to the individual needs, concerns, and developmental aspirations of their followers. They provide personalized support and coaching, showing genuine care and consideration for each person, thereby enhancing their growth and development.

Additionally, transformational leaders possess the ability to effectively handle conflict and manage stress in various situations. They demonstrate resilience and composure under pressure, facilitating productive resolutions to conflicts and maintaining a positive, constructive atmosphere within the team or organization. Their skills in conflict resolution and stress management contribute to fostering a healthy and productive work environment.

1. What does the article do well?
It effectively introduces the Full Range Leadership Model by outlining its three subtypes: laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational leadership styles. This clear categorization helps readers quickly grasp the main components of the model.

2. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article?
I would recommend the following improvements to enhance the article:


 * Expansion of Leadership Styles: Elaborate further on each leadership style (laissez-faire, transactional, and transformational) to provide a comprehensive understanding of their characteristics, key features, and how they manifest in different situations.
 * Advantages and Disadvantages: Include a section that outlines the advantages and disadvantages of each leadership style. This will give readers a deeper insight into the pros and cons of each approach, aiding in decision-making and understanding their potential impacts.
 * In-depth Analysis: Incorporate real-world examples or case studies to illustrate how each leadership style has been applied successfully or faced challenges. Practical applications can provide valuable context and enhance comprehension.

3. What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
Adding a section discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each leadership style would be the most important improvement. This would provide readers with a balanced view of each style's merits and drawbacks, helping them understand when and where to apply each style effectively.

4. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?
Yes, the clear categorization of leadership styles at the beginning of the article is a great way to introduce complex concepts to readers. Incorporating a similar clear and structured introduction into your own article will help readers grasp the main ideas right from the start. Additionally, considering real-world examples to illustrate key points can enhance the understanding and applicability of your content.

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)